Steven Augart wrote: > I received a suggestion in private mail from David Holmes (who's been > generous with his time in discussing this with me) that we could > break up the initialization of java.lang.System into two > explicitly-invoked phases, and that a VM could optionally > request that the initialization be broken up, based on a > configuration setting. > I've asked him for permission to forward the full text of his > suggestion to the list. > I think that is the approach we will have to take.
Isn't it about time that we consider my suggestion to radically reduce the whole initialization ordering mess by moving everything into separate classes in the gnu.classpath.internal package? Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
