Andrew Haley wrote: > Jeroen Frijters writes: > > Andrew Haley wrote: > > > Make 1.5 bytecode a reqiurement for the 1.0 branch. > > > > I don't understand what you mean by this. Supporting 1.5 > bytecode in the > > VM is trivial, but we don't have any 1.5 source compilers > yet, do we? > > Sorry, I thought it was clear. Tom said "Here are the minimal changes > required to support 1.5 bytecode", and that's what I was referring to.
I don't understand how the two are related. If we make supporting 1.5 bytecode a requirement for GNU Classpath 1.0, what would that buy us without actually having a 1.5 capable compiler and using the 1.5 features in the Classpath sources? Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
