Am Donnerstag, 25. November 2004 20:33 schrieb Ewout Prangsma: > Michael Koch wrote: > >>>Yes, such stuff can be done as optimization. But we have to do > >>>this carefully. We have to make sure this can be exploited by > >>> bad code. I would guess the current code can be exploited. I > >>> need to write some applets to test this. > >> > >>I think this approach would be safer, because the open method i > >>mentioned can (and should) be package protected. The current > >>FileChannelImpl is public, so everyone can access it. > >>About the optimization, i consider it necessary when i want to > >> use classpath out of the box, since i'm not supporting native > >> methods. > > > >package-privateness doesn't help much when the class is in a > > different package. We need to carefully check how to do this. > > Corret, that's why it should be in the same package. Like most of > the VM classes are.
Hmm, where would you put it ? Into java.nio.channels because it inherits FileChannel, or java.io because its used there ? Michael -- Homepage: http://www.worldforge.org/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
