Grzegorz B. Prokopski writes: > On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:52, Michael Koch wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 25. November 2004 19:35 schrieb Archie Cobbs: > > > Michael Koch wrote: > > > >>Assuming that this glibj.zip has the default Configuration.java > > > >> and that is acceptable to the builder, why not provide a way to > > > >> configure the build so you can just install glibj.zip as > > > >> shipped? > > > > > > > > I think shipping a glibj.zip is not good. This should be removed > > > > from source tarball. > > > > > > Just curious.. why do you say that? > > > > I think there is no real need for it. It just bloats the source > > tarball. All sources are included inside to tarball to build it. > > I agree. > > As you've just said this is a *source* tarball. A .zip file containing > .class files definitely does not count as a source. Altough this way > of distributing is popular in java world, I think it'd be much nicer > to simply have separate *binary* distribution of the glibj.zip.
Absolutely right. Binaries have no place in source tarballs, even for java. Andrew. _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
