S. Meslin-Weber wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 04:37:11PM +0100, Jeroen Frijters wrote: > > Clearly a broken app ;-) It's easy to think up patterns to avoid > > creating the actual thread until the point where you know > you're going > > to run it. > > There could be a marginal justification for creating Thread objects at > initialisation, way before they're scheduled to be started > and that's on embedded or other resource constrained systems.
Yeah, but that'll always be a fixed number so leaking them shouldn't be a huge problem either. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
