Archie Cobbs wrote: > Jeroen Frijters wrote: > > I don't think we should have a file based on black listing > tests that > > don't work, I'd like to have a file that simply lists all > tests that are > > known to be good. There are two reasons for this, the most important > > being that I want to see who adds (or removes) a test to > the known good > > list and why (and the second that I hate scripts ;-)). > > The problem with that approach is that if someone adds a new test > to Mauve, it doesn't automatically get added to our "white list".
That's a feature, not a bug! In practice new tests often get added that don't yet run without failures (and this is the right thing to do). So I strongly believe we should work with a white list. Regards, Jeroen _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
