On Tue, 2005-01-18 at 09:58, Fernando Nasser wrote: > Michael Koch wrote: > > Am Samstag, 15. Januar 2005 18:59 schrieb Chris Burdess: > > > >>Ewout Prangsma wrote: > >> > >>>Are there any plans or activities to include the javax.management > >>>api in classpath? > >> > >>This API would normally be developed under the auspices of the > >>classpathx project. Nobody has got around to writing it yet, are > >>you interested? > > > > > > There are several free implementations out there already: > > MX4J, XMOJO etc. > > > > The last release of MX4J (2.1.0) came with a few problems. We are > desperately needing people to help looking into fixing them. That would > be much more productive than writting another JMX from scratch. > > Regards to all, > Fernando > > > _______________________________________________ > Classpath mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
MX4J uses the Apache Software License, which, IIRC, is incompatible with the Classpath license. -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." -- Richard Stallman "We've all been part of the biggest beta test the world has ever known -- Windows" -- Victor Wheatman, Gartner
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
