>>>>> "David" == David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David> It sounds a bit questionable to merge the bug tracking system before David> we have a single merged code base. Classpath and libgcj are really like different branches of a single source base. They mostly share code, but some parts are different and they move at different speeds -- I see the situation as being analogous to the difference between the trunk and the gui branch. I think having a shared bug database is basically an administrative move, recognizing that most of these bugs are really shared. We can manage them the way we manage bugs on any branches. There are already a fair number of bugs in the gcc bugzilla that really are classpath bugs... merging like this just makes it simpler to push bugs upstream, and for classpath and gcj hackers to have a shared view of the library's state. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
