Am Freitag, den 04.03.2005, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Mark Wielaard: > Hi, > > On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 19:34 +0100, Roman Kennke wrote: > > When I have this ready, I will include both > > the antlr sources and the generated .java files in the classpath source > > tree, so that we have no additional dependency. The question here is, is > > it necessary that the generated .java files are formatted and commented > > just like normal source files? This can easily become a maintainence > > nightmare... What are your opinions? > > I am a bit afraid of the use of various/different parser generators for > the core classes.
This issue is already resolved. I decided to write a parser for RTF myself, without relying on a parser generator. This allows for some more flexiblity on my side, and is a good refresh for my skills ;-) /Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
