Am Montag, den 07.03.2005, 21:49 -0600 schrieb Archie Cobbs: > In this thread: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/classpath/2004-12/threads.html#00137 > > we talked about putting together somehow a list of Mauve tests that > all Classpath-based VMs should expect to pass, along with another > (complementary) list of those tests a Classpath-based VM should > expect to fail.
Sorry if I am completely naive here, but why should there be tests, that a Classpath-based VM should be expected to fail?? Isn't the whole point to (ideally) pass all tests? If there would be such a test, I would rather rewrite the harness.check(cond) into harness.check(!cond) so that the (expected) failure passes... /Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
