Hi Chris, Thanks for the positive feedback :) Very interesting result, though of course, on any computational task Apple's (Sun's) JIT is much faster (8x on jBYTEmark). But if we're just comparing interpreter performance, from my benchmarking, JamVM is around 80% faster...
Thanks, Rob. On Apr 1, 2005 10:09 PM, Chris Burdess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Robert Lougher wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce the release of JamVM 1.3.0 > > (http://jamvm.sourceforge.net). This release adds support for Mac OS > > X/Darwin, along with several other feature enhancements. > > Can I just say: > > dog [~] uname > Darwin > > dog [~] time java test > Calling Locale.getAvailableLocales > number of locales: 134 > > real 0m3.630s > user 0m2.680s > sys 0m0.770s > > dog [~] time jamvm test > Calling Locale.getAvailableLocales > number of locales: 274 > > real 0m0.295s > user 0m0.170s > sys 0m0.110s > > JamVM totally rocks. > -- > Chris Burdess > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide > Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. > Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Jamvm-general mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jamvm-general > _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
