Hi Tom, On Mon, 2005-05-23 at 10:33 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > Mark> Tom, does your "big merge" work depend on 4.0 things? > Mark> Do you want to get that in before 0.16 (end of next month)? > > I would like to but it is unclear whether it will happen. There is > still a lot of testing to do.
Do you mean this depends on 4.0 or that you would like to finish this work before 0.16. Or both? > But, most of the classpath side of this merge is already done. There > is just the one remaining patch, I think, at least to configury. Lets try to get the classpath side in asap then. > One open question is what to do with various bug workarounds in the > gcj tree. One plan is to fix the gcj bugs. Another is to just have > "temporary" overrides in the gcj tree for this. I am not sure I am following what kind of bug workarounds you are talking about. The current rule for GNU Classpath is that CVS (and the snapshot release of course) should compile with at least the latest gcj and jikes releases (and if at all possible with the CVS versions of both and any other compilers out there if we have testers that are willing to add bugfixes/workarounds for them). Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
