On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 20:23 +0100, Chris Burdess wrote: > Andrew John Hughes wrote: > > ... Also, on reading the new specs. for this stuff, something > > seems to apply that this run-time dropping may only be temporary (i.e. > > that the idea is to ween people off non-generic code). But I'd be > > really interested to hear the opinion of others on this. > > http://www.tbray.org/ongoing/When/200x/2005/06/12/Comparable
Did I miss something? How does this relate to what I said? -- Andrew :-) Please avoid sending me Microsoft Office (e.g. Word, PowerPoint) attachments. See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html No software patents in Europe -- http://nosoftwarepatents.com "Value your freedom, or you will lose it, teaches history. `Don't bother us with politics' respond those who don't want to learn." -- Richard Stallman Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html public class gcj extends Freedom implements Java { ... }
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
