>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew John Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Andrew> Yet there is still a body of code on the generics branch that goes in Andrew> the latter category (the valueOf() functions in the primitive classes Andrew> for instance). Should this be merged across? I think that is fine. Andrew> And what is the general Andrew> view on adding modified versions of some classes (e.g. Enum), as has Andrew> been proposed, so as to give temporary, primarily run-time support? This seems dangerous to me. But I haven't really tried to think through the ramifications. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
