-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 3 July 2005 07:02, Grzegorz B. Prokopski wrote: > > ... but there are a whole load of related changes that I've been > > applying over the last couple of days. > > I am sure there was. But from a VM developer POV I must admit that as > much as I would love to include the profitable changes that have been > made in last days, still it would be hard for me to choose which ones > they were and which of these are not too risky for a stable SableVM > release :-) > > In other words, if you feel that some of other parts of your patches > were also critically important (~bugfixes only), it would be great if > you could send them as separate patches. As Mark said, it's unlikely > that VM devs would ship GNU Classpath unpatched, so this sounds like > the right thing to do. "We" (the VM devs) just need to know which > patches we should apply :-)
Let me point to the option to create a stable-branch again, this kind of work is exactly what they are meant for. - -- Thomas Zander -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCx58uCojCW6H2z/QRAhVrAKDj+c5swpjvBU9rEXzgvGP9MNzzTQCaAw2h jDYbDV5qY/vqjf+R9+bT4cU= =Njaj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
