Please do not remove the gtk icons, they are used for the BasicLookAndFeel right now.
Thanks, Lillian angel On Mon, 2005-07-18 at 11:32 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Dalibor" == Dalibor Topic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > >> Surely they'd be needed to implement getPlatformLookAndFeel() or > >> whatever the method is called? (along with a hypothetical > >> gnu.javax.swing.plaf.qt package for KDE users) > > Dalibor> So I am wondering whether anyone uses them (and for what they are > used > Dalibor> ;). As the code is neither built nor referenced from the rest of the > Dalibor> library code, I'm wondering whether one can safely remove it. > > My impression is that they were the start of a gtk-like plaf, but then > never finished. I think it would be fine to remove them. Just make a > tag or something before you delete them so that it is easy to > resurrect them later if someone really wants to. > > Dalibor> So I'd propose removing the unused classes, but keeping the > Dalibor> icons subdirectory around, since that one is used by > Dalibor> javax.swing. > > Probably these should be moved to resource/ anyway. > > Tom > > > _______________________________________________ > Classpath mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
