On 9/6/05, Jeroen Frijters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Good point. I was thinking about tool support (like in Visual Studio > where it implements an interface for you), but that really should be a > separate consideration from whether Japitools flags the difference or > not. So I guess we'll have to modify Japize to include the Object > methods in every interface.
I was going to go the other way - *exclude* methods from interfaces if they're identical to those in Object. I can't think of any differences in behavior that would result (unless there are compatibility errors in Object itself, in which case you've got bigger problems ;) ) but it would make the japi files marginally smaller. Can you think of any reasons to go the other way? The file size difference is minimal enough that it's worth doing if there are any concrete benefits, but I can't think of any. Stuart. -- http://sab39.dev.netreach.com/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
