Hi, Am Samstag, den 24.09.2005, 16:45 +0000 schrieb theUser BL: > Hi! > > Look at my comment at > http://forums.java.net/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=1510&tstart=0 > > It seems, that GNU Classpath handles the layout different to Suns Java. > > The GNU version makes more sense for me. But I am not sure, if Suns version > is that, how it is written in the standardization (one of Suns books).
Now that is interesting. At first sight I would also think that we do better here, but I am also not sure about this. I _know_ that our BoxLayout is a little buggy, especially with respect to the layout on the minor axis (that is, if the BoxLayout is along the Y_AXIS, this is the major axis, and how the components are laid out in the X_AXIS, this is the minor axis, which is the problem we have here). Also the constants you use here might be a little misleading, read the API docs to getAlignmentX(): <<< This specifies how the component would like to be aligned relative to other components. The value should be a number between 0 and 1 where 0 represents alignment along the origin, 1 is aligned the furthest away from the origin, 0.5 is centered, etc. >>> So maybe Sun has some other interpretation of origin here? There is at least one other property that influences the origin, this is the componentOrientation. If that is right-to-left, then the orgin is on the right side for sure. > So, is the bug in GNU Classpath or in Suns Java? I don't know to be honest. /Roman
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
