Mark Wielaard wrote: > This looks like something the compiler should warn against > "public/protected field/return with package/private type" > (inner classes could be private). > > Tom are you taking notes for gcjx? > > I think japi should also warn against it not hide it, except when > explicitly told to.
I agree. We're never going to get a 100% score on Japi anyway [1], so hiding this stuff doesn't do any good in my opinion. Regards, Jeroen [1] One example I can think of is the non-constant serialVersionUID fields in some classes (that compute their serialVersionUID based on some runtime setting or such) _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
