On Do, Okt 20, 2005 at 09:06:55 +0200, Julian Scheid wrote: > David Gilbert wrote: > >One question - what's left to do before a 1.0.0 release? I think it's > >ready now... > > I just got a bug report about an NPE and, while fixing it, noticed that > the documentation for abstract methods didn't include the abstract > keyword (!) > > With bugs like that still cropping up, I'd rather keep the 0.x tag for > now... > > I agree that a major release should be aimed for in the next couple of > weeks, especially because I'm planning a major rewrite of the gjdoc > core. But the last thing I want is to have some annoying bug in the > first major release ever. After literally years of on-and-off hacking > on gjdoc, I don't see a need to hurry. > > Anyway, thanks for your encouraging words and let's see how well the > fixed 0.7.6 release works for people. If no other major bugs are > reported against 0.7.6, I'll consider naming the next release 1.0-pre1.
I know version numbers like 1.0-pre1 are pretty common. But still uply for automated version comparison. Please use some thing like 0.99.1, 0.99.2, etc. Cheers, Michael -- Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath! http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/ _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
