Hi, On Wed, 2005-10-26 at 13:33 -0600, Tom Tromey wrote: > IMO it would require a dedicated volunteer... the releases already > seem to take a lot of Mark's time, and we would want to minimize > differences between the two branches at release time in order to avoid > confusion on the part of Classpath users.
Yes. Andrew is doing a very fine job keeping the branch up to date. Thanks Andrew! Since he is doing that I spend my own time on CVS head first. Personally I feel concentrating on getting a robust 1.4-like core library out first is really important (especially as long as gcj cannot handle the new 1.5 language extensions). But if have a dedicated volunteer that wants to do -generics releases in parallel that is of course fine. Cheers, Mark
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
