Sorry, just saw there's no shared thing, had got things a little mixed up. Cheers, J.V.
2005/11/10, Joao Victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yes... but doesn't util.Timer already use a single thread? If so, then > i think it would be correct for each component to instantiate a > swing.Timer - as long as that timer, "inside", is using a single > thread at its back-end. > > I also think that, at Sun's docs, the swing.Timer doesn't have a > sharedInstance() method, which i suppose it means it shouldn't be a > singleton. > > Cheers, > J.V. > > > 2005/11/10, David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The documentation in Sun's jdk strongly implies that all > > javax.swingTimers share a single thread. Any implementation that does > > not do this should be viewed with a great deal of suspicion. > > > > David Daney. > _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
