Jeroen Frijters wrote: > Andrew Haley wrote: > > Gary Benson writes: > > > Michael Koch wrote: > > > > The solution is to use gnu.classpath.SystemProperties.getProperty(...). > > > > This does no security check. It is exactly for such issues. > > > > > > Out of interest, what stops user code from calling such things? > > > > Nothing. That's one of the bugs on the list. > > That's not exactly true. The system class loader does enforce that > user code cannot access classes in protected packages. It's just > that we don't have the proper security configuration files in place > to define the protected packages yet.
You make it sound like an easy fix: is it? What needs to be done, and where? Cheers, Gary _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
