>>>>> "Roman" == Roman Kennke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Roman> I investigated the state of our VM interface by looking at the stuff in Roman> native/jni and here are the classes that seem to directly access native Roman> code without utilizing a VM interface: I think there are already PRs for most of these. I would suggest filing PRs for the remaining ones and making a "native code out of core" meta-PR linking to them all. Roman> The remaining stuff is for the midi and iconv providers, I think these Roman> are optional anyway and don't belong in a VM interface (or do they?). No, they don't belong in a VM interface. A provider is already behind an interface wall. IMO the appropriate approach here is to simply write multiple providers. Tom _______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
