On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 17:36 -0700, Tom Tromey wrote: > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Mark> In the meantime, without disturbing existing documents or arrangements, > Mark> we should refrain from distributing /new/ material from RFC sources > Mark> without specific legal review. > > Can we link to RFC URLs?
It seems RFCs can be considered as freely distributable documentation so that should be fine. But linking to external documentation is of course no substitute for having real self-contained documentation, which is why we had wanted to use the actual text of the RFCs. Cheers, Mark BTW. There is a work in progress page of one of the other GNU maintainers on problems with the IETF copying permissions and what actions he is taking to get them fixed: http://josefsson.org/bcp78broken/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Classpath mailing list Classpath@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/classpath
