On Feb 1, 2006, at 12:25 PM, Tom Tromey wrote:
"Casey" == Casey Marshall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Casey> Any thoughts on adding a "crypto" or "security" component to
Casey> Classpath Bugzilla? And maybe a "security" keyword that
describes
Casey> direct security issues?
For a new component I think we generally want to have a default owner
for the bugs. In any case, if you think it is worthwhile, then I'm
for it.
I can be the default owner of those bugs. Or maybe Raif, if he wants
to. The two of us wrote the bulk of the crypto code.
For security right now we have a meta-bug which depends on all the
security issues -- PR 13603. This is a bit weird since this predates
classpath using bugzilla, and is filed against gcj.
I don't know the pros and cons of meta-bugs versus keywords. I'm
fine with whatever works.
That's not a big deal. It's just that crypto/ssl is a large part of
Classpath now, so it makes sense that it have it's own component (and
bugs!).
