On Fri, Mar 10, 2006 at 01:40:21PM +0100, Julian Scheid wrote: > So I've finally got a chance to look at the ecj parser yesterday, and > indeed it seems to be perfectly suited for the task. It even comes with > a Javadoc comment parser which appears to be adaptable for Gjdoc's > purposes. Assuming that you're right about the licensing issues, I > agree that this lends itself very well. Thanks for the heads-up.
Nice. > I'll look further into this during the next week(s) and keep you up to date. Thanks a lot! TWISTI
