Andrew John Hughes wrote: > From the above e-mail, it looks as if gcj will shortly be linking in > ecj as its front end. With this, gcj will be able to handle 1.5 constructs.
> What do people think of now beginning the merge of the generics branch > back on to HEAD? If the ability to compile it is there, I'm all for it. I see no reason to keep them off of HEAD as long as gcj can compile them. -- Morgon Kanter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
pgp3wzlQPRTL7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
