Bryce McKinlay wrote:
Roman Kennke wrote:
Also, the ability to see/track when a failure started occurring could
be very useful. That way we could easily match up new failures with
patches that caused them.
Hmm, that's an interesting feature indeed. We would have to keep diffs
between versions around and teach the script to parse and display them
somehow. I must think about this a little.
It should become a bit easier with the new test harness. When you treat
1 test = 1 failure, each pass/fail can be uniquely identified, and
regressions can be distinguished easily from new test cases.
Yes, I posted a patch that makes the new harness the default and removes the old
one to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yesterday. No one has responded thus
far, but I'd appreciate comments.
Tom
