Audrius.
Only part of RMIC (direct bytecode generation) is really dependent from
ASM. That part which supports the source code generation is not
dependent, was a separate compiler in the past and can be easily
separated apart again. If we do not like ASM, this should make using the
alternative replacement easier, as only the bytecode generating part
needs to be rewritten. The classes being generated are also relatively
simple.
- ASM and gnu.bytecode Andrew Haley
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Audrius Meskauskas
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Andrew Haley
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Per Bothner
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Thomas Fitzsimmons
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Andrew Haley
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Per Bothner
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Tom Tromey
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Andrew Haley
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Dalibor Topic
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Tom Tromey
- Re: ASM and gnu.bytecode Mark Wielaard