On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Andrew Haley <a...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 12/08/2010 11:44 AM, Brian Jones wrote: > >> I've only recently gone from svn to git and honestly git is freaking >> awesome sauce. >> >> I'm pretty sure what you are missing is how much nicer having local >> branches can be for local development. The cvs way would be >> multiple checkouts, and a lot of manual diffing and merging. >> >> If Classpath were on svn at least then you could use git svn as a >> contributor with ease. But yea, git and github are pretty sweet. > > You seem to be assuming the rest of us don't use such systems. We do, > every day. > > Please don't top-post.
Oh okay, as long as you'll admit any dvcs is better than cvs for contributors, I suppose I can post in this way. Brian
