Quoting Leslie P. Polzer ([email protected]): > Is there a particular reason for clbuild to use > absolute links instead of relative ones? > > It makes migration of a clbuild library collection > to another machine or even directory unnecessarily hard.
Although I haven't written the current version of the symlink logic, my impression is that there probably was no particular reason clbuild did it this way. I agree that relative links would be better. I have just pushed a patch implementing that idea, and hopefully I haven't broken all those register_asd functions while doing so. Please review and test. d. _______________________________________________ clbuild-devel mailing list [email protected] http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clbuild-devel
