Diederik van Arkel-2 wrote: > > > I know both John and myself have been playing with regex entries so one > should be forthcoming. > > Any further progress on this. It still shows not missing: http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/gp4/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=clean&lang2=clean Diederik van Arkel-2 wrote: > > > The remaining two benchmarks relate to concurrency which is currently > not supported in Clean. > > Wow. Why is that? How long before it is added? One major issue is getting it to work across platforms I suppose. Haskell uses monads to to concurrency. Is the lack of monads the reason that it hasn't been done? Diederik van Arkel-2 wrote: > > I hope you're enjoying your Clean experience, regards, > Yes, I like Clean quite a bit. I never quite mastered Haskell monads. And I never liked how there seemed to be two divergent schools of abstraction in haskell - monads and arrows. I think the I/O facilities in Clean are much easier to work with. And the Language Report is very thorough. Whenever I didnt understand a function/operator, I just searched the report to figure it out. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Computer-Language-Shoot-Out-tp3473850p19151555.html Sent from the Clean mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
