On Fri, 13 Mar 2009 14:51:53 -0700 (PDT), Carlos Aya <[email protected]> wrote:
>Hello, > >> Don't let IO monad rule the world! > >From recent post in Haskell-caffe > >http://groups.google.com/group/fa.haskell/browse_thread/thread/4373bf8adb5dff0f > >In there.. > >>Lazy IO *as implemented (originally) in GHC* (and copied into the >>Haskell standard) breaks referential transparency.[1] Clean's object IO >>system, I believe, would not have this problem. Nor would a >>well-designed Haskell IO system. >>jcc > >looks like a clear window of opportunity for Clean! > >The thing I complain about is that if you put "Haskell mysql" as opposed to >"Clean mysql" in google the relevance of results is quite different. It took >me a while to find lethevert's post. > >Yes, this is again a 'rebranding clean' email. Have you considered close >spellings like 'cleen' for example?.... Another alternative name to consider is "Concurrent Clean." -- Benjamin L. Russell -- Benjamin L. Russell / DekuDekuplex at Yahoo dot com http://dekudekuplex.wordpress.com/ Translator/Interpreter / Mobile: +011 81 80-3603-6725 "Furuike ya, kawazu tobikomu mizu no oto." -- Matsuo Basho^ _______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
