Dear Bas, That sounds good... Didn't (and couldn't) know that Ok, I'm going to try both suggested options then, see which one works best for me.
Thanks again, Chide ________________________________ Van: [email protected] [[email protected]] namens Bas Lijnse [[email protected]] Verzonden: woensdag 30 november 2011 16:14 Aan: [email protected] Onderwerp: Re: [clean-list] Dynamic typing for communication with non-cleanprograms Dear Chide, the JSON serialization works fine with ADTs. It simply represents them as JSON arrays that contain a string as first element that encodes the contstructor. The only limitations the library has are serialization of functions (inside data structures) and inherently lazy structures. Serialization is done strict, so serialization of infinite lists isn't the best idea :) Serialization of functions is possible through some trickery with dynamics, but that is kinda scary and crashes your program if you deserialize after recompilation :) Best, Bas On 30-11-11 16:04, Groenouwe, C. wrote: Dear Bas and Erik, Thanks for your good tips, I'll keep them in mind. However, I don't know to what extent it applies to my current situation. My first post was perhaps a bit misleading in that I have defined some types which beautifully fit in algebraic data types. I.e. I'd rather express the problem in the Clean type than in an OO structure (btw, the other language I use is not java, it was just an hypothetical example). I guess JSON is not expressive enough to deal with ADTs, or is it? ________________________________ Van: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] namens Bas Lijnse [[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>] Verzonden: maandag 21 november 2011 15:02 Aan: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Onderwerp: Re: [clean-list] Dynamic typing for communication with non-cleanprograms The JSON libraries that Erik mentions are available from: https://svn.cs.ru.nl/repos/clean-platform/trunk/src/libraries/OS-Independent/Text/ I always use this when I want to do simple data exchange between Clean and another language (I may be biased as author/maintainer of the library though :) ) Best, Bas On 21-11-11 14:52, [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: And dump all the hard work on Java? Dynamics are a proprietary Clean format and likely more complex/liberal than you need. Maybe JSON is easier to use: probably available in your JAVA implementation already and under the hood JSON converters are already available in Clean iTasks. -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> namens Groenouwe, C. Verzonden: ma 21-11-2011 13:39 Aan: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> CC: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Onderwerp: [clean-list] Dynamic typing for communication with non-cleanprograms Dear Pieter (and others), Then another question: If you want to send information from one programming language (e.g. Java) to Clean, a typical way to go would be the following. First define an intermediate representation (for example in XML, or your own format). Then write a generator on the sender's side (in this case in Java), which converts a Java value or object into a file in the intermediate representation. Finally, write a parser on the receiver's side (Clean) which parses file holding the intermediate representation into a Clean value (with a Clean type). This is a labourious process during which you have the feeling you are are doing a lot of unnecessary work. As if you are repackaging the same sandwich three times in a row, first in a Java structure, then in the intermediate structure, and then again in a Clean structure... Waste of time (and the environment...) ;-) However, I had an idea: is it possible to use Clean's dynamic types for this purpose? Instead of generating some arbitrary intermediate type on the sender's side, immediately generate a value that can be read by Clean's dynamic type system. This would cut your work in half: you don't have to write a parser on Clean's side any more. I don't have any experience using Clean's dynamic typing yet, therefore I decided to first ask whether it is a fruitful approach before exploring it. Thus, is this possible and is it a good idea? Of course, I'm also open to other suggestions. Thanks in advance, Chide _______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
_______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
