> From: "Groenouwe, C." <[email protected]> >Sent: Thursday, December 15, 2011 1:57 AM
>A quick glance at the following benchmark, gave me the impression that Clean >and Caml seem to perform best with regard to memory consumption: > >http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ > >Is that true? Please note the caveats listed in the "Compare Memory-used for all the benchmarks" section of the Help page. http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/help.php#comparememoryused >Additional question: which functional languages exploits (hardware) >parallelism running on a multi core CPU best? (Or more CPU's)? Clean is not listed in the benchmarks game 4-core measurements because the released compiler is not multi-threaded. Note the "≈ CPU Load" column in the other measurement tables, for example - http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64q/benchmark.php?test=all&lang=ocaml&lang2=ghc#faster-programs-measurements _______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
