On 22-7-2013 11:59, [email protected] wrote:
So why is :: *Record = {field :: [*Char]}an accepted type?
In function types the compiler accepts [*Char], and changes this to *[*Char]. Unfortunately this is not implemented for (other) type
definitions. The compiler should reject this type, or add a '*'. The current compiler accepts this useless type. Kind regards, John van Groningen _______________________________________________ clean-list mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.science.ru.nl/mailman/listinfo/clean-list
