I think it really depends on your deployment. We use inband, virtual gateway and are not running a whole ton of checks and it seems to be going fine... Well, as fine as any version of Clean Access we've implemented (particularly with Macs, we've had some serious annoyances with each version so far).
Should the Mac client get fixed to not take up all the system resources (have we had any word on this?), we at the Univ. of Portland would be fully up to 4.1.3.1 and chugging away fine. - Sean ---- Sean Hennessey Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator The University of Portland -----Original Message----- From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Stewart Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 1:27 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Thoughts on 4.1.3? Spring break is next week for us. How is everyone on the list feeling about 4.1.3.1? After watching the list after this release we decided to hold off. I still have some mixed feelings about this release but wanted to see how the list felt. Thanks! Dennis Xu wrote: > We upgraded to CCA 4.1.3.0 with agent 4.1.3.1 yesterday and haven't seen > any issues. But if you have double quotes in the agent download page > text, your agent download page maybe messed up after the upgrade. This > happened to us. The workaround is to replace all the double quotes with > single quotes. The bug ID for this issue is CSCsm32684. > > Dennis Xu > Network Analyst(CCS) > University of Guelph > 5198244120 x 56217 > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins > Sent: February-05-08 1:50 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Thoughts on 4.1.3? > > I'm looking to upgrade our CCA 4.1.2.0 up to 4.1.3.0 (with agent > 4.1.3.1) > shortly. We don't use the Macintosh agent. I'm not interested in most of > > the new features but I'd like support for the latest AV software, and 64 > > bit Windows would be nice as well. > > I haven't heard anything very positive about this version. Is it stable > enough now or should I wait for the next one? > > Cisco folks, is there a 4.1.3.1 Server update imminent? > > -Mike > > -- Jeff Stewart Network Engineer Network Computing & Support Western Kentucky University
