Off the top of my head...

You can create checks that check for domain membership.  I would reasonably
assume that if it's joined to the domain, then it's part of your
organization.

Or are you looking for something more indepth.

On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 1:06 PM, Newman, Harris <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>  We only want to allow machines that are owned by our organization onto
> the network. (in addition to meeting our security policies).
> thanks,
> Harris
>  ------------------------------
> *From:* Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] *On Behalf Of *Mike King
> *Sent:* Sunday, March 30, 2008 8:37 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: System validation rules
>
> Hi Harris,
>
> I guess the question I have is:
>
> What is your goal?
>
> Is it to only allow machines that are owned by your organization onto the
> network?
>
> Or is it to allow users on the network regardless of the machine, as long
> as the machine meets your security policy?
>
> Mike
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Newman, Harris <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >  I beginning a NAC rollout and was wondering if this is possible:
> >
> > We wish to only allow our workstations on our internal network.  In
> > looking at the rules available, I can check for registry entries and files,
> > and the contents of each (and date/time stamps for the files).  If this
> > information were to get out, it would not be of any use.  Once the
> > information becomes known, these checks are worthless.
> >
> > What is needed is some way of ensuring that the equipment is ours.
> >
> > In the Cam users guide there is a discussion of a "Launch Programs
> > Example" which utilizes a valid data signature signed by certificates in
> > order to have a rule check to see if a service is running that is signed.
> > (What is to stop someone from writing a service with the same name to get
> > around this?).
> >
> > I guess my question is: Is there a way to programmatically check to see
> > if the system is "ours", ie: use public/private keys to validate the system
> > is "ours".
> >
>

Reply via email to