I'm running 4.1.2.1 here with Cisco Checks & Rules 49803 and both are checked.
Bruce Osborne Liberty University -----Original Message----- From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike Diggins Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:51 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CLEANACCESS] XP SP3 question again Just to clarify, are Cisco's preconfigured rules now correctly checking patch levels for both XP SP3 and Vista SP1? I still have my work around in place. If true, are there any minimum software version requirements for the servers or agent? I'm running 4.1.2.0. -Mike On Fri, 18 Jul 2008, Osborne, Bruce W. (NS) wrote: > On recent Clean Access, the preconfigured rules already support SP3 > patches. Am I misunderstanding the question? > > > > Bruce Osborne > > Liberty University > > > > From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Sean > Sent: Friday, July 18, 2008 1:29 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [CLEANACCESS] XP SP3 question again > > > > Hi all - > > > > I'm setting up the rules to support SP3 on our network and I'm managing > to confuse myself. Do I remove the SP2 rule entirely? If I do and make > SP3 optional (to start with) will that allow users with neither onto my > network? If anyone has tips on how they deployed this, I'd appreciate > the sharing of them. > > > > I know this is a rather elementary question but I spend so much time on > the other side of NAC that I've managed to completely forget most of the > rule parameters... > > > > - Sean > > > > ---- > > Sean Hennessey > > Networking and Information Security Systems Administrator > > The University of Portland > > _________________________________________ Mike Diggins Voice: 905.525.9140 Ext. 27471 Network Analyst, Enterprise Networks FAX: 905.528.3773 University Technology Services E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario
