Don Click wrote: > Yes, we bought our hardware about 3 years ago, based on the equivalents > to the appliance as well. I actually need to make some decisions this > year (next 3 or 4 months) on if we are keeping Cisco’s NAC, or something > else. I know Symantc and Microsoft have something similar, but haven’t > had a chance to look at anything yet. Any suggestions from the gallery > on alternatives?
Based on some bad experiences and the perceived user imposition, we've held off on requiring the agent, and continue to run version 3.5.11 in-band agentless. Rather than convert even this aging installation to 4.5.1 with new appliances, we, too, are migrating to SafeConnect. -- Celebrating the 200th anniversary of Darwin's birth, and the 150th anniversary of the publication of the Origin of Species. -- Cal Frye, Network Administrator, Oberlin College Mudd Library, x.56930 -- CIT will NEVER ask you for your password! www.calfrye.com, www.pitalabs.com "Force, without wisdom, falls of its own weight." -- Horace.
