Ken,

I would only suggest you to stay away from 4.5.0.0.  It not only has the 
problems with Norton, but also with Vista in combination with any Symantec AV 
product.  Thanks for the info on 4.1.10.



Richard Pastor
Information Technology Services
The John Marshall Law School

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 4:37 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NAC3350

Hi Richard:

The release notes for 4.1.10 agent have some newer AV versions than 4.5.1 and 
Cisco removed some AV versions from 4.5.1
Doug Chudzik posted this info about Norton 16.5 not working with 4.1.8 agent 
and others also complained about Norton 16, so I assume there is a problem with 
4.5.1. We also need free AVG 8.5 detection as well, ok with 4.1.10 (posted by 
Isabelle Graham) not with 4.5.1.

I would like to know what version (4.1.8 or 4.5.1) other NAC administrators are 
using for comparison.

Ken


>Someone from Cisco emailed me and I tested the trial version of Norton 
>Internet Security 2009 (16.5) here, and it does indeed >work with the 4.1.10 
>Agent. It failed in the 4.1.8 Agent.
>
>On Symantec's website they want you to give a credit card to download the 
>trial, but I found a copy on Softpedia that doesn't >require any info since 
>they have it mirrored: 
>http://www.softpedia.com/get/Security/Firewall/Norton-Internet-Security.shtml
>
>Doug Chudzik
>ResNet Manager
>Wellesley College

>====
>I've just started testing with the 4.1.10 agent and it looks like it supports 
>AVG 8.5 free at least.
>I don't have a copy of NIS 2009 to test with unfortunately.
>
>----
>Isabelle Graham
>Information Security
>American University




*****************************************
    Ken Webber        Ph. 902-494-2217
    Networks and Systems
    Dalhousie University
    Halifax, N.S, Canada
    E-mail [email protected]
*****************************************

________________________________
From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Pastor, Richard
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 3:16 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: NAC3350

Ken,
We have 4.1.8/4.5, and definitely have the problems you describe.   Last 
Wednesday, I submitted my whines to the group, but haven't received any replies 
to this point.  Do you have reason to believe that agent 4.1.10.0 would be 
better?


Richard Pastor
Information Technology Services
The John Marshall Law School

From: Cisco Clean Access Users and Administrators 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ken Webber
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 10:34 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: NAC3350

Hello all:

We have just required two NAC3350 servers and I am tying to decide to use 4.1.8 
with agent 4.1.10.0 or 4.5.1. 4.5.1 appears scary with its AVG and Norton 
detection problems and some open caveats. Any feedback would be helpful.

Thanks, Ken


*****************************************
    Ken Webber        Ph. 902-494-2217
    Networks and Systems
    Dalhousie University
    Halifax, N.S, Canada
    E-mail [email protected]
*****************************************

Reply via email to