Thank you Mike!
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Mike King <[email protected]> wrote: > Daniel, > The feeling around here is that NAC is going to go EOS (End of Sale) Soon > after ISE get's to version 2.0, since version 2.0 will provide feature > parity with NAC. > My company is not looking at using any for it's VDI deployments, since we > have 100% control of the enviroment, and are setup in such a way that the > machines are destroyed and spun up in pools. > That being said, I did see some sales mumbo jumbo when I google it: > http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Virtualization/Cisco-Systems-Citrix-Unveil-New-PointtoPoint-VDI-System-478292/ > > Mike > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 1:12 PM, Daniel T <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Many organizations have gone with Virtualized Desktops and I was >> wondering if anyone has an insight they can share on the product map >> in relation of VD. Our setup is centralized OOB real IP gateway. My >> worry is that I will be forced to bring the servers closer to the >> users and use Inband setup. Cisco's licensing model of 3 CAS servers >> or 20 (with nothing in between) doesn't work for me. >> >> Regards, >> /Daniel > >
