On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 02:20 -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > So, as part of the tunneling putback, should we update the dlpi_send() > manpage to indicate that `daddrp' is ignored for tunnel datalinks? (Seems > like we have some other libdlpi-related work to do, such as the > DL_CURR_DEST_ADDR[1] support we talked about a few weeks back.)
Yes, this will have to be done. > > [1] A comment in dld_str.c mentions DL_NOTE_DEST_ADDR instead of > DL_CURR_DEST_ADDR. Good catch, I'll fix that. -Seb
