On Wed, 2008-06-11 at 20:21 -0400, Peter Memishian wrote: > > That sounds like it should work. Is there potentially a race condition > > between dhcpagent removing the route and in.mpathd realizing that the > > interface has failed and therefore should not remove the next hop from > > the target list? > > No, since in.mpathd is responsible for triggering the group failure by > setting the IFF_FAILED flag on the last usable interface in the group. > Setting IFF_FAILED will in turn cause the kernel to clear IFF_RUNNING on > the IPMP IP interface, which will cause dhcpagent/routing daemons to > remove the routes -- but by that time, in.mpathd is well aware the group > has failed.
Ah, good. This sounds like a good plan, then. -Seb
