> This is what I have so far. Have I missed anything? Are any updates to the documentation necessary for the revised vanity naming kernel code?
> An additional question from me is, does the removal of the fast-path also > necessitate the removal of MAC_CAPAB_MDT? I was under the impression > that we could still make use of MAC_CAPAB_MDT without a fast-path, yet it > was ripped out of clearview-uv along with the fast-path. I'm unclear how MAC_CAPAB_MDT would work without a fastpath, unless we taught the GLDv3 framework about MDT in general (which given software LSO seems the wrong direction). I do recall a separate discussion that the new fastpath should be able to use MDT, but I don't think it needs MAC_CAPAB_LDT to do so. -- meem
