Peter Memishian wrote: > > > Is this viable? If so, it seems like it would make sense to do this for > > > other "update" routines where the requested state matches the current > > > state known to the framework. > > > > > I guess it won't harm to have the extra check in mac_unicst_update, but > > I am not sure. Nicolas/Eric may know the history here. > > OK. Nicolas? Eric? >
since this is not in the data path, I don't see a problem with adding the extra check. eric
