Peter Tribble wrote: > On Dec 14, 2007 7:04 AM, Max Zhen <Max.Zhen at sun.com> wrote: >> A little bit background: >> We're trying to use smf instances to represent networking configuration >> in a system. Our current design is that one data link, or IP interface >> is represented by one smf instance. > > Does this include logical interfaces? > > The idea that all network interfaces (especially logical interfaces) > be represented as individual services doesn't make any sense to > me. It makes administration much harder, and apart from the temporary > configuration problem isn't likely to scale. > > Would it make sense to consider interface groups in the same way that > we have share groups managed by sharemgr? >
In this proposal, what is the administrative model, when one wants to administer, for example, a property of an underlying physical interface for a logical interface? --Sowmini -- This message posted from opensolaris.org
