> > I've updated http://atlantic.east/ws/meem/physaddr/webrev; please let me > > know if the revised ip_reprocess_ioctl() and ill_set_phys_addr_tail() > > match what you wanted. > > I've looked at the code and have no substantive comments. > > ip_if.c: > > * 23657: one too many "their"
Doh -- will fix. > Regardless of my lack of finding anything useful to comment on, at least > this lets me see what's coming up in this code. As part of the > tunneling work, I'm introducing DL_CURR_DEST_ADDR as an address type > that can show up in notifications and DL_PHYS_ADDR_ACK. It's also one > more address type we'll request when sending down the sequence of > DL_PHYS_ADDR_REQ's in ill_dl_phys(). Seems like that should fit in smoothly. Thanks for the review -- I know it's headache-inducing stuff. -- meem
