Sebastien Roy wrote: > 3. Proposed Architectural Changes > > This case proposes a new sys_dl_config privilege that is a subset of > the existing sys_net_config privilege. This privilege will be > required to make modifications to datalink configuration, but will > not be required to read datalink configuration.
Does this mean that either sys_net_config or sys_dl_config will be sufficient ? If it doesn't then there will likely be updates to the dladm entries in exec_attr required. -- Darren J Moffat
